All,
I continually try to educate myself as much as possible on the many different cycles and their effects. One trend or best practice I see is that many run either short esters together such as Test P, NPP, Mast P, or long esters together such as Test E and EQ.
My question is:
1. Can you run long and short esters together such as Test E and NPP?
2. Would the gains/results be better with Test P and NPP opposed to Test E and NPP?
3. At the end of the day, are the results of either methodology drastically different via more size, strength, vascularity, hardness, BF % loss???
Im simply not sure because I've seen the proponents who state "test is test" and the ester is the only difference but the results are the same. Others believe short esters work better together and keep your test levels more stable. That said, could long esters be taken more frequently such as 2 to 3 times weekly opposed to 1 time weekly which would nearly be the same as short esters in order to keep test levels stable.
I ask this question because in my TRT regimen I have a small stock pile of Test C pharma grade stored up but for all of my future planning cycles I want to add short esters such as NPP, Tren A, Mast P, etc. I want to keep my use of pharma grade Test C as the test base since I will always have some on hand for a cycle. I have no issues adding Test P or Sus as the base for Test, but being that I have ample Test C on hand Im trying to plan the best cycles possible for the future and not waste any of the products, time, and effort. Ultimately same as everyone I want to get the best bang for my buck and maximize cycle results.
Hope I made sense in all my thoughts. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.