turnupthegas
New member
Prior to posting up cycle log on what i'm, planning on attempting as always I'd appreciate some feedback from the fam.
Not gonna get to in depth to training and diet regimen, but know that I'm one anal retentive OCD bastard and its dialed in to a T. I will have some diet questions, but will hit up @mrfixit and a few select others for some more diet advice! Have you seen his competition pictures? looks to be doing everything right!
Anyway long and skinny is test and eq right through. while esters rise contemplating a dbol kickstart for 4 weeks or an NPP EOD for 4 weeks on the front side of the cycle.
on the back side I will switch to prop last 4 weeks and either go with (prop/var) (prop/mast) or (prop/win)
goal is slower lean bullk for a good 16 week and then try to lean out on the back side from a BF perspective under the assumption that I could reduce calories but still have enough anabolics in me to preserve muscle. When I say reduce I also do not mean in a deficit, but back to a TDE type nature where I'm eating just what I need with the hopes that newly gained muscle combined with not eating in a surplus will drop bf without having to restrict my calories.
Now my main question is this. I've been at this some time with aas and I can put on the size and I can lean out, I feel I have plateued in a sense with what my body is capable of doing naturally.
Genetics are obviouslly a huge part of this, I come from a long line of tall thin Irish Fishermen lol For me at 6' 190 lbs I don't move much past that number. I'm not looking to be over 200 and massive, but my lean weight is around 165 when i hit 190 i'm basically puffy round with higher bf.
I would like to be at a place where i'm 180-185 and lean in the next two years and i'm dancing with the idea of GH and creating new muscle cells vs just growing muscle cells with aas. It seems like a logical approach if I want to get bigger and not watch the gains dissipate like they do after a cycle. PCT kicks my ass and shits on my hard work, even when I attempt to do everything right in my off months?
Just looking for some insight and if so am I better with IGF or GH - some say IGF is better on cycle unless you have enough GH to run 2 months before cycle and during pct because of the time it takes to really reap the rewards and that IGF-1 wil get to work quicker and yield similar results just by a different mechanism.
So IGF or GH or if you think niether how would you layout the compounds above?
I'm 37 and don't want to commit to a trt protocol at this age, I'd rather keep my natty test still working before I make that leap later in life.